Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Association between wetland disturbance and biological attributes in floodplain wetlands

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We quantified the influence of agricultural activities on environmental and biological conditions of floodplain wetlands in the upper Missouri River basin. Seasonally-flooded wetlands were characterized as low impact (non-disturbed) or high impact (disturbed) based on local land use. Biological data collected from these wetlands were used to develop a wetland condition index (WCI). Fourteen additional wetlands were sampled to evaluate the general condition of seasonally-flooded floodplain wetlands. Structural and functional attributes of macrophyte, algae, and macroinvertebrate communities were tested as candidate metrics for assessing biotic responses. The WCI we developed used six biological metrics to discriminate between disturbed and non-disturbed wetlands: 1) biomass of Culicidae larvae, 2) abundance of Chironomidae larvae, 3) macroinvertebrate diversity, 4) total number of plant species, 5) the proportion of exotic plant species, and 6) total number of sensitive diatom species. Disturbed wetlands had less taxa richness and species diversity and more exotic and nuisance (e.g., mosquitoes) species. Environmental differences between low and high impact wetlands included measures of total potassium, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, alkalinity, conductance, and sediment phosphorus concentration. Canonical analyses showed that WCI scores were weakly correlated (P = 0.057) with environmental variables in randomly selected wetlands. In addition, mean WCI score for random wetlands was higher than that for high impact wetlands, implying that floodplain wetlands were less impacted by the types of agricultural activities affecting high impact sites. Inter-year sampling of some wetlands revealed that WCI metrics were correlated in 2000 and 2001, implying that biological metrics provided useful indicators of disturbance in floodplain wetlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Andraski, B. J., D. H. Mueller, and T. C. Daniel. 1985. Phosphorus losses in runoff as affected by tillage. Journal of the American Soil Science Society 49: 1523–1527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apfelbeck, R. S. 2001. Development of biocriteria for wetlands in Montana. p. 141–166. In R. B. Rader, D. P. Batzer, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Bioassessment and Management of North American Freshwater Wetlands. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association (APHA). 1998. Standard Methods for the Evaluation of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahls, L. L. 1993. Periphyton bioassessment methods for Montana streams. Montana State Water Quality Bureau, Helena, MT, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. C., R. H. Norris, and T. B. Reynoldson. 2001. Taxonomic resolution of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in bioassessmerits. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 20: 280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder, and J. B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. Second Edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA. EPA 841-B-99-002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batzer, D. P., A. S. Shurleff, and R. B. Rader. 2001. Sampling invertebrates in wetlands. p. 1339–1354. In R. B. Rader, D. P. Batzer, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Bioassessment and Management of North American Freshwater Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blocksom, K. A. 2003. A performance comparison of metric scoring methods for a multimetric index for mid-Atlantic highlands streams. Environmental Management 31: 670–682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, T. B. and A. K. Tatschl. 1977. Changes in flood-plain vegetation and land use along the Missouri River from 1826 to 1972. Environmental Management 1: 343–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, T. M., D. G. Uzarski, J. P. Gathman, J. A. Jenet, B. E. Keas, and C. A. Stricker. 1999. Development of a preliminary invertebrate index of biotic integrity for Lake Huron coastal wetlands. Wetlands 19: 869–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling Techniques, 3rd edition. John Wilely & Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, DC, USA. FWS/OBS-79/31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubenmire, R. 1959. A canopy-coverage method of vegetation analysis. Northwest Science 33: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. B., J. L. Baker, A. G. van der Valk, and C. E. Beer. 1981. Prairie pothole marshes as traps for nitrogen and phosphorus in agricultural runoff. p. 153–164. In B. Richardson (ed.) Proceedings of the Midwest Conference on Wetland Values and Management. Freshwater Society Publishing, St. Paul, MN, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeyser, E. S. 2000. A vegetative classification of seasonal and temporary wetlands across a disturbance gradient using a multimetric approach. Ph.D. Dissertation. North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, E. A. 1977. Chironomid communities in small prairie ponds: some characteristics and controls. Freshwater Biology 7: 121–133.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ell, M. J. 1993. Standard operating procedures for field samplers. Surface Water Quality Management Program, Division of Water Quality, North Dakota State Department of Health and Consolidated Laboratories, Bismarck, ND, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Euliss, N. H., Jr., J. W. LaBaugh, L. H. Fredrickson, D. M. Mushet, M. K. Laubhan, G. A. Swanson, T. C. Winter, D. O. Rosenberry, and R. D. Nelson. 2004. The wetland continuum: a conceptual framework for interpreting biological studies. Wetlands 24: 448–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euliss, N. H., Jr., D. A. Wrubleski, and D. M. Mushet. 1999. Wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region: invertebrate species composition, ecology, and management. p. 471–514. In D. P. Batzer, R. B. Rader, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Invertebrates in Freshwater Wetlands of North America. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, J. A. and J. L. Richardson. 1997. Soils and sediments as indicators of agricultural impacts on northern prairie wetlands. p. 119–144. In S. A. Peterson, L. Carpenter, G. Guntenspergen, and L. M. Cowardin (eds.) Pilot test of wetland condition indicators in the Prairie Pothole Region of the United States. US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN, USA. EPA/620/R-97/002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galat, D. L., L. H. Fredrickson, D. D. Humburg, K. J. Bataille, J. R. Bodie, J. Dohrenwend, G. T. Gelwicks, J. E. Havel, D. L. Helmers, J. B. Hooker, J. R. Jones, M. F. Knowlton, J. Kubisiak, J. Mazourek, A. C. McColpin, R. B. Renken, and R. D. Semlitsch. 1998. Flooding to restore connectivity of regulated, large-river wetlands. BioScience 48: 721–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galatowitsch, S. M., D. J. Whited, and J. R. Tester. 1999. Development of community metrics to evaluate recovery of Minnesota wetlands. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery 6: 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genies, M. C. and J. C. Helgen. 1999. Indexes of biotic integrity for wetlands: vegetation and invertebrate IBIs. Final report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. St. Paul, MN, USA.

  • Gerritsen, J. 1995. Additive biological indices for resource management. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 14: 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, R. A. 2001. Invertebrate egg and plant seed banks in natural, restored and drained wetlands in the prairie pothole region (USA) and potential effects of sedimentation on recolonization of hydrophytes and aquatic invertebrates. Ph.D. Dissertation. South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, R. A. and N. H. Euliss, Jr. 1998. Sedimentation of prairie wetlands. Great Plains Research 8: 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goonan, P. M., J. A. Beer, T. B. Thompson, and P. J. Suter. 1992. Wetlands of the River Murray flood plain, South Australia. 1. Preliminary survey of the biota and physico-chemistry of ten wetlands from Chowilla to Mannum. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 116: 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugerud, N. J. 2003. Use of macroinvertebrates to assess biological integrity and differences in forested and nonforested community structure in seasonally flooded wetlands of the Upper Missouri River. M.S. Thesis. South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgen, J. C. and M. C. Genies. 2001. Monitoring the condition of wetlands: indexes of biological integrity using invertebrates and vegetation. p. 167–186. In R. B. Rader, D. P. Batzer, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Bioassessment and Management of North American Freshwater Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, L. W. and G. E. Mestl. 1993. An alternate hydrograph for the Missouri River based on the pre-control condition. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13: 360–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. H., F. McCormick, A. T. Herlihy, P. R. Kaufmann, and R. J. Stevenson. 2000. The use of periphyton assemblage data as an index of biotic integrity. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19: 50–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, M. and D. A. Wolfe. 1973. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R. M. 1995. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions. p. 31–47. In W. S. Davis and T. P. Simon (eds.) Biological Assessment and Criteria. Lewis Publishers, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. R., C. L. Milewski, and K. F. Higgins. 1996. Summary and selected annotated bibliography of the ecology of the upper Mississippi and Missouri River drainage basins with emphasis on wetlands and riparian zones and the impact of flood control and flooding on the ecosystem. p. 113–149. In D. L. Galat, and A. G. Frazier (eds.) Overview of River Floodplain Ecology in the Upper Mississippi River Basin. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C., R. L. Burgess, and W. R. Keammerer. 1976. Forest overstory vegetation and environment on the Missouri River floodplain in North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 46: 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C. A., S. D. Bridgham, and J. P. Schubauer-Berigan. 2001. Nutrient dynamics in relation to geomorphology of riverine wetlands. Journal of the American Soil Science Society 65: 557–577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley, and R. E. Sparks. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. p. 110–127. In D. P. Dodge (ed.) Proceedings of the International Large River Symposium. Special Publication Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences.

  • Kantrud, H. A., J. B. Millar, and A. G. van der Valk. 1989. Vegetation of wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region. p. 132–187. In A. G. van der Valk (ed.) Northern Prairie Wetlands. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantrud, H. A. and W. E. Newton. 1996. A test of vegetation-related indicators of wetland quality in the prairie pothole region. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health Management 5: 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. 1987. Biological monitoring and environmental assessment: a conceptual framework. Environmental Management 11: 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R. S. and C. J. Richardson. 2002. Evaluating subsampling approaches and macroinvertebrate taxonomic resolution for wetland bioassessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21: 150–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange-Bertalot, H. 1979. Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia 64: 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R. 1993. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. L. 1974. Environmental requirements and pollution tolerance of freshwater diatoms. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA. EPA-670/4-74-005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, J. J. 2001. Vegetation Index of Biotic Integrity (VIBI) for wetlands. Final report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Columbus, OH, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. B. and W. A. Hartman. 1987. The effect of cultivation on sediment composition and deposition in prairie pothole wetlands. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 34: 45–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, D. R., S. L. Sheeley, and J. E. Brown. 2005. Mosquito development within microhabitats of an Iowa wetland. Journal of Medical Entomology 42: 685–693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R. W. and K. W. Cummins (eds.). 1996. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. 3rd edition. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minns, C. K., V. W. Cairns, R. G. Randall, and J. E. Moore. 1994. An index of biotic integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes’ areas of concern. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51: 1804–1822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northern Great Plains Floristic Quality Assessment Panel. 2001. Coefficients of conservatism for the vascular flora of the Dakotas and adjacent grasslands. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Information and Technology Report USGS/BRD/ITR-2001-0001.

  • Omernik, J. M. 1999. Level III ecoregions of the continental United States. Map. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Corvallis, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D. 1997. Conservation of fertilizers and livestock manure. National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, G., F. Ryckman, J. Hendrickson, J. Lee, C. Grondahl, and D. Bruning. 2000. Cross the wide Missouri: Significant Missouri River system biological sites. North Dakota Outdoors 63: 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rader, R. B. 2001. An introduction to wetland bioassesment and management. p. 1–11. In R. B. Rader, D. P. Batzer, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Bioassessment and Management of North American Freshwater Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rader, R. B., D. P. Batzer, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.). 2001. Bioassessment and Management of North American Freshwater Wetlands. John Wilely & Sons Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P. B. 1997. National list of vascular plant species that occur in wetlands: update of national summary. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C. J. and J. Vymazal. 2001. Sampling macrophytes in wetlands. p. 297–338. In R. B. Rader, D. P. Batzer, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Bioassessment and Management of North American Freshwater Wetlands, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS. 1999. SAS Institute Incl, SAS procedures guide, Version 8, Cary, NC, USA.

  • Shubert, L. E. 1984. Algae as Ecological Indicators. Academic Press, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. E. 1998. Need for ecosystem management of large rivers and their floodplains. Bioscience 45: 168–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. E., P. B. Bayley, S. L. Kohler, and L. L. Osborne. 1990. Disturbance and recovery of large floodplain rivers. Environmental Management 14: 699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinman, A. D., J. Conklin, P. J. Bohlen, and D. G. Uzarski. 2003. Influence of cattle grazing and pasture land use on macroinvertebrate communities in freshwater wetlands. Wetlands 23: 877–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J. 2001. Using algae to assess wetlands with multivariate statistics, multimetric indices, and an ecological risk assessment framework, p. 113–140. In R. B. Rader, D. P. Batzer, and S. A. Wissinger (eds.) Bioassessment and Management of North American Freshwater Wetlands, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teels, B. M. and P. Adamus. 2001. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: developing metrics and indexes of biological integrity. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA. EPA 822-R-01-007f.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F. and P. Smilauer. 1998. CANOCO Reference manual and user’s guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. M. and J. C. Trexler. 1997. Sampling aquatic invertebrates from marshes: evaluating options. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 16: 694–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USCOE (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers). 1978. Review report, Missouri River, South Dakota, Nebraska, North Dakota, Montana, review draft environmental statement. Office of the Chief of Engineers, Department of the Army, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USCOE (U. S. Army Corps of Engineers). 1994. Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Study and Technical Appendices (Vol. 1–8). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Missouri River Division, Omaha, NE, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002a. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: using vegetation to assess environmental conditions in wetlands. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. EPA-822-R-02-020.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency) 2002b. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: using algae to assess environmental conditions in wetlands. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. EPA-822-R-02-021.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (U. S. Environmental Protection Agency) 2002c. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: Developing an invertebrate index of biological integrity for wetlands. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA. EPA-822-R-02-019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam, H., A. Mertens, and J. Sinkledam. 1994. A coded checklist of ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms for the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, M. R. and C. P. Hawkins. 1996. Effects of sampling area and subsampling procedure on comparisons of taxa richness among streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werlin, K. B. 2002. Development and application of vegetationbased biomonitoring criteria for floodplain wetlands. M.S. Thesis. South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzel, R. G. and G. E. Likens. 1991. Limnological Analyses. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. A. 1995. Wetland and aquatic macrophytes as indicators of anthropogenic hydrologic disturbance. Natural Areas Journal 15: 240–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, D. A., J. E. Meeker, P. L. Hudson, B. J. Armitage, M. G. Black, and D. G. Uzarski. 2002. Hydrologic variability and the application of index of biotic integrity metrics to wetlands: a Great Lakes evaluation. Wetlands 22: 588–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USGS South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, South Dakota State University, 57007, Brookings, South Dakota, USA

    Steven R. Chipps

  2. Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Sciences, South Dakota State University, 57007, Brookings, South Dakota, USA

    Daniel E. Hubbard, Kent B. Werlin, Neil J. Haugerud & Kipp A. Powell

  3. National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory Mid-Continent Ecology Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 6201 Congdon Boulevard, 55804-2595, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

    Jo Thompson

  4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, 80202-2466, Denver, Colorado, USA

    Tom Johnson

Authors
  1. Steven R. Chipps
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel E. Hubbard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kent B. Werlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Neil J. Haugerud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kipp A. Powell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jo Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tom Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chipps, S.R., Hubbard, D.E., Werlin, K.B. et al. Association between wetland disturbance and biological attributes in floodplain wetlands. Wetlands 26, 497–508 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[497:ABWDAB]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2006)26[497:ABWDAB]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Search

Navigation